I am almost done with my poster for class. The poster was a lot harder to layout than I thought it would be. The main problem was giving out enough information, yet not giving out so much that all it is is a lot of reading.
The talks last week seemed to go quite well. Several of the topics I had never even looked at before. Especially, the beetle presentation. I have only taken an introductory entomology course, so it was all new to me.
Tuesday, May 4, 2010
Sunday, April 11, 2010
A Flock of Dodos
After watching the movie, it was quite obvious that the Evolution scientists have the best facts on their side. However, they are not doing what it takes to communicate their ideas to the general public. The Intelligent Designer's are able to simplify their message into catchphrases that are easily learned and repeated by the general public. The phrases are simplistic and easily remembered.
The Evolution scientists appeared unable, and maybe even unwilling, to simplify their message for the general public. They used larger words that many people don't usually use. The use of these words leads to confusion for the general public. The main problem was when the scientists refused to show up for the debate. By boycotting the debate and leaving only a lawyer to answer the questions, it made the scientists look weak. That weakness resulted in the general public believing that the scientists were unable to defend their position.
The scientists refusal to debate the situation only resulted in the intelligent designers becoming more popular. The boycotting of the debate actually appeared to make the problem worse. In order for the scientists to be more effective, they need to adopt the same strategies as the intelligent designers. The scientists need to hire a PR firm to put together a campaign with slogans and talking points. Without a PR campaign, I think it is unrealistic to think that the scientists will be able to communicate effectively with the general public.
The Evolution scientists appeared unable, and maybe even unwilling, to simplify their message for the general public. They used larger words that many people don't usually use. The use of these words leads to confusion for the general public. The main problem was when the scientists refused to show up for the debate. By boycotting the debate and leaving only a lawyer to answer the questions, it made the scientists look weak. That weakness resulted in the general public believing that the scientists were unable to defend their position.
The scientists refusal to debate the situation only resulted in the intelligent designers becoming more popular. The boycotting of the debate actually appeared to make the problem worse. In order for the scientists to be more effective, they need to adopt the same strategies as the intelligent designers. The scientists need to hire a PR firm to put together a campaign with slogans and talking points. Without a PR campaign, I think it is unrealistic to think that the scientists will be able to communicate effectively with the general public.
Saturday, April 3, 2010
Change of Topic
I have decided to change my research topic to Livestock Waste Management. I worked for the Kansas Dept of Health and Environment for a year in the livestock waste management inspection area. Because of my experience in the area I think that my presentation and poster would be quite a bit more interesting, at least for me. I hope to impart some of my knowledge on the class and the ways that geology and biology play into livestock waste management.
Wednesday, March 31, 2010
ECM Description
Reaserch Topic
I am thinking of changing my research topic area to Animal Waste and its possible pollution. I have worked in this area before and know a significant amount about it already. I also have been doing a lot of research on animal waste and the new regulatory requirements being put into place.
Columnar Jointing
Tuesday, March 2, 2010
GeoMapApp Project
The dataset that I have chosen to look at is the Nephelometry Station information. The Nephelometry shows the amount of light that passes through a sample of water. The amount of light that passes through shows the turbidity of the water. The turbidity is the indication of the amount of suspended particles present in the water.
Using the information from the nephelometry surveys, the turbidity of the water at outlet points of rivers can be compared to areas in the open ocean. The differences will show a general area of where the suspended particles will begin to fall out of the water and deposit on the ocean floor. That information can be used to find areas of higher deposition that may yield a better record of past events where more suspended solids were added to the outletting rivers. That will indicate flood type events and partially their intensity.
Using the information from the nephelometry surveys, the turbidity of the water at outlet points of rivers can be compared to areas in the open ocean. The differences will show a general area of where the suspended particles will begin to fall out of the water and deposit on the ocean floor. That information can be used to find areas of higher deposition that may yield a better record of past events where more suspended solids were added to the outletting rivers. That will indicate flood type events and partially their intensity.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


